Wallet logo and token list inclusion for your token

What does wallet logo and token list inclusion deliver?

Wallet logo and token list inclusion helps users recognize a token in supported wallet contexts by aligning its visual asset and project information. The practical goal is a coherent, reviewable submission—not a claim that every wallet will display the token in every screen.

Wallet assets, token-list information and verification are related but distinct tasks. A logo file may be ready while project details need correction; a submission may be complete while an app’s display remains outside your control. We map the request to the specific platform and status you want to address, including Trust Wallet assets and Jupiter verification.

Before starting, decide what the team needs most:

• A logo or asset update for a token already visible in a wallet.
• Preparation and coordination for a new wallet-facing submission.
• A review of inconsistent names, symbols, contract details or project links.
• A traceable status update for an existing request.

We begin with a compact wallet-asset review: compare the materials you provide, flag mismatches, and return a single list of items to approve. If the work also involves broader listing readiness, see listings and verification for adjacent platform submissions.

What should you prepare for Trust Wallet and Jupiter?

Prepare one approved source of truth for the token before any wallet-facing request. Matching information makes review and follow-up more efficient, and it gives your team a reliable way to check what was submitted.

Share the token’s network and contract address, the approved token name and symbol, the project website, relevant social or community links, and the logo files your team intends to use. If you have already contacted Trust Wallet or Jupiter, include the request reference, submission date if known, and any response or requested changes. Do not send private keys, seed phrases or other wallet credentials.

We check that the supplied materials agree with one another, identify missing or unclear fields, and confirm which requested change belongs to which platform. Wallet display and token-list information can be separate from token information on an explorer; if explorer details need attention, coordinate that work through explorer token info and logo updates. If circulating-supply information is also being reviewed, keep that task distinct and see supply verification.

A useful handoff is a shared folder with clearly named, approved files and a short note stating which logo and token details are final. This removes avoidable back-and-forth and lets the project owner approve the exact submission package.

Which wallet assets and verification tasks are included?

The service turns your approved token information into a clear work package for wallet-facing requests. The agreed scope is confirmed before submission so your team knows which assets, platforms and follow-up actions are covered.

Depending on the project, the package can include:

• A review of supplied logo files and token identity details.
• A consistency check across name, symbol, network, contract and project links.
• Preparation and coordination of Trust Wallet asset-related requests.
• Support for a Jupiter verification request, using the information your team approves.
• Submission-status tracking and a concise record of actions and responses.

We do not treat a wallet logo request as a substitute for every other profile update. If users also encounter incorrect token information on DEXTools or DEXScreener, those profiles need their own review; compare the scope with DEXTools and DEXScreener profile updates. Likewise, wallet visibility is not the same service as a listing on a market-data platform.

The key deliverable is a documented handoff: what was checked, what was submitted or coordinated, what remains pending, and what your team needs to provide next. You retain approval over project facts and visual identity. We keep the process organized and surface inconsistencies before they become repeated corrections.

How does the wallet inclusion process move from review to follow-up?

We run wallet inclusion in phases: confirm the goal, prepare the materials, coordinate the submission, then report the status and next action. The first working phase is typically week one; the sequence after submission follows the platform’s response and any requested corrections.

Preparation: At kickoff, we use a wallet kickoff checklist to confirm the token, target platform, requested change, asset owner and approval contact. We compare the supplied information and return any conflicts for your team to resolve.

Launch: Once you approve the final package, we coordinate the agreed Trust Wallet or Jupiter request and log the action. We keep platform-specific items separate, so a change requested for one wallet is not mistakenly treated as a completed update elsewhere.

Follow-up: We check for a visible status or response, record questions, and route any decision back to your project contact. If new information is required, we identify the exact item instead of asking for a broad resubmission.

Reporting: You receive a concise status note listing completed work, pending platform actions, outstanding materials and the next follow-up. This format gives your team a clear audit trail and makes it easier to coordinate related listing requests without conflating separate platform reviews.

What can wallet platforms decide, and what should you do next?

Your team controls the accuracy of project information and the assets it approves; Trust Wallet and Jupiter control their own review decisions and how or when information appears in their products. We can document and coordinate the agreed work, but cannot promise acceptance, a particular display location, timing of a platform response, or uninterrupted token-list visibility.

For a stronger submission, make one person responsible for approving token facts and another for providing the final visual files, then resolve inconsistencies before the request goes out. Keep a copy of the approved package and the follow-up record together. If the project is changing its name, contract or brand, coordinate the wallet request with a migration and rebranding update so public-facing details do not diverge.

To begin, send us the token network and contract address, the wallet or wallets you want to address, your approved logo files, project links, and any existing submission correspondence. BrandBoost Guru will review the package, return the kickoff checklist and confirm the agreed scope before work moves into submission coordination.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Confirm the wallet goalTell us whether you need an asset update, a new wallet-facing request or support following up on an existing submission.
2. Share approved project materialsProvide token details, logo files, official links and any platform correspondence. Keep sensitive wallet credentials out of the handoff.
3. Complete the asset-readiness reviewWe compare the supplied information, flag mismatches and return a checklist for your project owner to approve.
4. Coordinate the agreed requestAfter approval, we organize the Trust Wallet or Jupiter work in scope and record the submission or follow-up action.
5. Review the status reportYou receive a concise record of completed work, pending platform actions and any materials needed for the next follow-up.