Circulating Supply Verification on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko

What circulating supply verification covers on CMC and CoinGecko

Circulating supply verification gives CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko a documented basis for assessing the token amount your project reports as circulating. The work is not just a number check: it connects the reported figure to token allocations, wallet balances, vesting terms, and supply changes.

A useful starting point is to separate balances by status rather than send one headline figure. For each allocation, record who controls it, whether it can move, and what event changes its status. Relevant categories may include:

• Tokens available to the public market.
• Team, investor, or treasury allocations and their vesting or lock conditions.
• Tokens held in contracts, including the purpose and release terms of each contract.
• Tokens burned or otherwise made inaccessible, with supporting transaction references.

This distinction helps reviewers understand how the project reached its circulating figure and where non-circulating supply sits. It also gives your team a repeatable reference for future unlocks, emissions, migrations, and other changes. If you are also preparing a broader platform profile, coordinate the supply work with your CoinMarketCap listing or CoinGecko listing so the project’s public information stays consistent.

How does the CoinGecko supply verification process begin?

The CoinGecko supply verification process begins with a reconciliation: we compare your reported figure with the evidence your team can provide and identify gaps before submission. The same review can prepare materials for CoinMarketCap, while keeping each platform’s submission and follow-up distinct.

Send the current supply figure, token contract details, allocation schedule, and any documents or public disclosures that explain restrictions on token movement. For each locked or reserved balance, include the relevant wallet or contract address, the amount, the reason it is excluded from circulation, and the conditions for release. If a balance is described as burned, provide evidence that supports that description rather than relying on a label alone.

BrandBoost Guru uses a named Supply Evidence Review before anything is submitted. We compare figures across the allocation table, token documentation, and available on-chain references, then flag mismatches for your team to resolve. That review is especially useful when several sources use different supply labels or when a previously published figure has changed. For a wider checklist on the topic, see our circulating supply verification guide. Your team confirms the final figures and factual explanations; our role is to make the evidence coherent and submission-ready.

Week 1, platform submission, and follow-up

A phased process keeps the supply review moving without submitting incomplete or conflicting information. We start with the evidence, launch submissions when the project has approved the figures, and use follow-up to address specific platform questions.

Week 1: reconcile and prepare. We collect the project’s current supply data, map allocations to their supporting materials, and return an open-items checklist. Your team confirms disputed classifications, supplies missing records, and approves the final explanation. If a contract migration or token rebrand affects the records, flag it at kickoff and coordinate the details with the migration and rebranding update service.

Launch: submit the approved case. We organize the relevant figures and supporting explanations for the selected platform workflow, keep the submissions aligned, and record what was sent. The project should have one authorized contact available to confirm technical or allocation details if a reviewer requests clarification.

Follow-up: respond and close the loop. We track requests, help prepare clear replies, and report what remains open. A submission is ready to move forward when the figures reconcile, each excluded balance has a stated reason, and the project can support its claims with evidence. If new supply information emerges, we pause and update the explanation instead of repeating an outdated figure.

What you receive from a supply verification engagement

You receive a working evidence pack, coordinated platform submissions, and a status report your team can use to manage the next action. The pack makes the reasoning behind your circulating figure easier to inspect and maintain.

Typical deliverables include:

• A supply reconciliation that separates reported circulation from relevant non-circulating allocations.
• An evidence checklist showing which wallet, contract, vesting, or public-document references support each explanation.
• A submission-ready narrative with consistent terminology and clearly stated assumptions.
• A record of submission details, platform replies, requested clarifications, and outstanding decisions.

The report is practical, not a promise of a particular platform outcome. It identifies what has been prepared, what has been submitted, and which items require a project decision or additional evidence. That format also helps finance, token operations, and communications teams work from the same approved figures. If you want to organize related profiles and platform work in one plan, start with our listings and verification overview. For projects that need a profile correction beyond supply figures, the separate CoinMarketCap community verification service may be relevant.

What remains in CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko’s hands?

CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko make their own decisions about how to review, classify, display, or update a project’s supply information. Their review criteria, requested evidence, and timing are outside our control, so we commit to the agreed preparation, submission, and follow-up work—not to approval or a particular displayed figure.

Before kickoff, assemble the current token contract details, allocation schedule, vesting or lock terms, and links to relevant public disclosures. Appoint one project contact who can verify the facts and approve responses. Then check that the same supply definitions appear across your website, token documentation, and platform materials. If a figure has changed, note what changed and when, and explain the event behind it rather than sending a bare replacement number.

For projects coordinating several public profiles, the supply file should be treated as a maintained source document, not a one-time attachment. Keep a dated copy of the approved reconciliation and update it when unlocks, emissions, burns, or other material supply events alter the evidence. To begin, send BrandBoost Guru your token contract, current supply breakdown, and the documents behind restricted balances. We’ll run the Supply Evidence Review, return the open-items checklist, and agree the submission sequence with your team.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Share the supply recordsSend contract details, allocation schedules, current figures, and the documents that explain locked or reserved balances.
2. Review and reconcileWe compare the figures with the supporting materials and return a checklist of gaps, questions, and inconsistencies.
3. Approve the submissionYour authorized contact confirms the final classifications and wording before the platform materials are sent.
4. Coordinate follow-upWe track platform replies, prepare clarification support, and report open items and next actions.